무료 이미지 : 경치, 나무, 들, 농장, 대초원, 언덕, 꽃, 골짜기, 수확고, 목장, 흙, 농업, 평원, 목초지, 농원, 고원, 서식지, 생태계, 스텝, 농촌 지역, 생체, 자연 환 ​​경, 땅의 제비 2880x1920

경치, 나무, 들, 농장, 대초원, 언덕, 꽃, 골짜기, 수확고, 목장, 농장, 흙, 농업, 대초원, 평원, 목초지, 농원, 고원, 서식지, 생태계, 스텝, 농촌 지역, 생체, 자연 환 ​​경, 땅의 제비 Public Domain

감사합니다 PxHere

저희 제작자들은 여러분의 의견을 듣고 사진을 어떻게 사용했는지보고 싶어합니다. 기부, 트윗, 페이스 북 및 팔로우를 통해 감사를 표하십시오!

기사에 포함 (예 : Wordpress, Blogspot)

This is a followup on the loss of resolution I have been seeing with Photomatix HDR software. Please note that this is not a test of anything but sharpness of the resulting image; it has nothing to do with colors, contrast, saturation, or whether the image even needs HDR or how much. It is just about the sharpness of a five-shot (1 ev spaced) HDR sequence taken of the totally uninteresting hill behind my house, and rendered with the default settings of the software. After making the composite, I did rebalance each image to make them all more or less similar. this involved curves and saturation adjustments in Photoshop. If you haven't already read my original post, you might benefit from reading it now. It appears to me that the Nik HDR Efex Pro 2 software does the best job of retaining the sharpness of the original image, with the Unified Color HDR Expose 2 doing almost as well. Photomatix tone mapping lags behind in sharpness. I'm thinking that the difference is sufficient to make me switch from Photomatix to one of the others. I'll have to check out features, speed, and finished images before deciding.



무료 고해상도 사진 경치, 나무, 들, 농장, 대초원, 언덕, 꽃, 골짜기, 수확고, 목장, 농장, 흙, 농업, 대초원, 평원, 목초지, 농원, 고원, 서식지, 생태계, 스텝, 농촌 지역, 생체, 자연 환 ​​경, 땅의 제비

, 촬영 NIKON D800E 01/18 2017 함께 찍은 사진 50.0mm, f/8.0s, 1/500s, ISO 100

모든 댓글(0)